Wednesday 26 May 2010

Logical Positivism, The Vienna Circle, and Saucermen



I use roads almost every day, in one way or the other. So does almost everybody else in the world, except for farmers, but even they use so-called "tracks" for driving tractors, corralling cattle, and being generally pretty strange and antisocial. Its a simple and brilliant life, but people live it. Roads define where we go pretty much, define what we see, which would be cool, if the only sights were not just fields and a one off statue of a T-Rex. Seriously. Take the M5 to Bristol. T-Rex.

Back during the 1920's there was a group. Bear with me. There was a group of people who established a way of thinking that influenced almost everything in life, from their views on religion, to politics, economics, and yes, even roads. Logical Positivism came from The Vienna Circle, a group of philosophers that gathered at Vienna University, around Moritz Schlick. It was sort of like the Algonquin Round Table, except in Vienna, and not as vicious in such a horrible, horrible way.

In the same way as any great philosopher, the group, chaired by Schlick had a massive impact on the world, in the same way that Hegel, Marx, Neitzsche and Kant did, with one important rule; that knowledge was defined by experience and proof. Of course, this meant that there was a strong interest in science, empiricism and reason, and skepticism of theology and metaphysics, but by far the biggest staple among logical positivists was verificationism, the theory that the idea that a statement or question only has meaning if there is some way to determine if the statement is true, or what the answer to the question is.

This verification principle was basically a way of splitting every question or statement into three convenient and accessible bite-sized chunks;

1. Is it true?
2. Is it false?
3. Is it verifiable?

Even now, this concept is used by Journalists in a very similar way, the most common being the way of avoiding libel;

"Is it true, and can we prove it?"

This principle can be used in many incidences of proving whether something is true or false, up to, and including things like the Roswell UFO Incident that happened in New Mexico in July of 1947, and even though that turned out to be nothing, nothing at all, it was strange how people believed it. Logical Positivists would be skeptical of something like this, unless there was hard evidence, or they had met a space alien themselves, despite theories that the aliens might be very far away, perhaps even, on other planets. But instead, what was indeed a downed weather balloon, and nothing else, would not have convinced anyone who followed procedures of the Vienna Circle, because it simply cannot be verified.

Logical Positivists also made Religion, and the existence of any Deity seem completely false. How could we prove that there is a God? What is there, right in front of us to show that there is something of a higher power than our own. Sure, there may be evidence, but much of it is subject to disproving, and almost all of it circumstantial. But its not just God that they had a bone to pick with. Even Freud was a target. His Psychology was based around the idea of a subconscious, something inside of our brains that dealt with our innermost emotions and primal instincts, but what use are these theories when there is nothing to prove any of this? There is no tangible evidence, nothing that can be experienced or explained beyond theories, you might as well be trying to prove the existence of Unicorns.

It seemed that the logic was airtight. The Verification Principle would be the standard on which any scientific theories would be either proven or falsified. Except something else turned up. Something dark and sinister. Something, named Karl Popper.

Popper was critical of Verificationism, arguing that the principle itself cannot be verified, instead touting his principle of Falsifiability, which is, instead of proving whether something is right because of evidence supporting it, it proves statements, questions and theories by falsifying evidence to the contrary. An example of this is;

Statement: All toilets are white.

Falsification: If we can find one toilet that is another color, we can conclude that the statement of "all toilets are white" is false, thereby proving that all toilets are at the least, white and one other color, a statement that can be proved by the existence of another color and so on. The original statement can also be construed as racist, but we will not get into that.


Roads are important, in the ways that one cannot think of, but when we look at designs of certain roads, we can see the influence of Logical Positivism. Take Milton Keynes, a place named after John Maynard Keynes, creator of Keynesian Economics. This place has logical roads. Logical roads! Unheard of by most people, but you can be sure that it is incredibly simple to get round to anywhere, unlike a place like Winchester, where the roads were most likely formed around pubs, and how easy it would be to get back home after said pubs. Its not science. Its not Logical. Would you rather live in a world with ease of public transport, or a world with a greater ease of getting smashed every night?

Okay, tricky question, but heres another one. Would you rather live in a world with art, and music, and trees and birds everywhere for no reason, or a place where you don't have a name, because its not logical?

Choose your poison, they're both bittersweet.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Welll, Maths has used this type of logic/proof since about 2000 BC - you cannot however disprove the existence of God (although I think religion is always subjective). The theory also uses "All" whereas you can also say "There exists" - so if for example if you say There exists a white toilet, by finding a red one you cannot disprove the first theory. If you say "There doesn't exist a God" - if you can't find hard evidence for this (that again isn't subjective) - you can't use the theory to disprove the existence of God.

S'what I think =)

Luke J. Garratt said...

nice point with the toilet, but what I was trying to say is that if a person was to make a general sweeping statement that all toilets were white, finding a red toilet would prove that this is wrong using falsifiability. I wasn't saying that finding a red toilet would suddenly make the first toilet disappear.

I guess. Maybe.

Chris Horrie said...

Superb blogging - the Gonzo piece is really excellent. Can you get hold of a tape recorder and use that as a script and perform it and produce it as an MP3 file. If so it would be great to include that in teh General election site we are going to make over the summer. It is really funny and a good read.

Rest of the blog is very good as well. Creative and worth a read always.

Anonymous said...

all the time i used to read smaller articles which also
clear their motive, and that is also happening with this post which I am reading now.


Feel free to visit my blog post: know more
my website - view more

Anonymous said...

Hi there mates, how is all, and what you desire to say regarding
this post, in my view its really remarkable designed for me.


Here is my page :: view next
Also see my website :: know more about

Anonymous said...

Hi there, I discovered your blog via Google at the same time as
searching for a related matter, your web site came up, it
seems to be great. I've bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
Hi there, just become alert to your weblog through Google, and located that it is truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I'll appreciate if you continue this in future.
Numerous other folks shall be benefited out of your writing.
Cheers!

Feel free to surf to my webpage ... know more
Also see my page :: know more

Anonymous said...

Wonderful post! We will be linking to this particularly great
post on our website. Keep up the good writing.

my site: more

Anonymous said...

Today, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iPad and tested to
see if it can survive a 30 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation.

My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.
I know this is entirely off topic but I had to
share it with someone!

my weblog :: view more

Anonymous said...

After looking into a few of the blog articles on your blog,
I seriously like your technique of blogging. I added it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back in the near future.
Take a look at my web site as well and let me know your
opinion.

Feel free to surf to my web page - move next

Anonymous said...

I think this is one of the so much vital information for me.
And i'm satisfied studying your article. But wanna commentary on some common things, The website taste is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Just right activity, cheers

my web-site :: view next

Anonymous said...

Hello, i think that i noticed you visited my blog thus i got here to go back the prefer?

.I am attempting to in finding issues to improve my website!
I suppose its ok to make use of some of your ideas!
!

Review my web page; view more about

Anonymous said...

I usually do not create a great deal of comments,
however i did a few searching and wound up here "Logical Positivism, The Vienna Circle, and Saucermen".
And I do have a few questions for you if it's allright. Could it be just me or does it look like some of these responses look like written by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are posting on other online social sites, I would like to keep up with everything fresh you have to post. Could you make a list of the complete urls of all your community pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

my site :: view more about

Anonymous said...

I do agree with all of the concepts you have presented on
your post. They are really convincing and can certainly work.
Still, the posts are very brief for starters. May just you please extend them a little from next time?
Thank you for the post.

my webpage ... next page

Anonymous said...

Inspiring story there. What happened after? Good luck!


Also visit my weblog ... more

Anonymous said...

I was suggested this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him
as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty.
You're amazing! Thanks!

my website - click next

Anonymous said...

Superb website you have here but I was wanting
to know if you knew of any message boards that
cover the same topics talked about here? I'd really love to be a part of community where I can get suggestions from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Cheers!

Here is my weblog ... know more

Anonymous said...

Hi theгe! I сould have sworn I've been to this site before but after reading through some of the post I realized it's new to me.
Nonethelesѕ, I'm definitely glad I found it and I'll be booκmarking and chесking back often!


Mу blog poѕt diamondlinks review